VT vs. VTI: Home vs. World

The debate between investing globally versus focusing solely on the US market has never been more relevant. At the center of this discussion are two of Vanguard’s most popular ETFs: VT (Total World Stock ETF) and VTI (Total Stock Market ETF). While both offer broad market exposure and rock-bottom fees, they represent fundamentally different investment philosophies that can significantly impact your long-term returns.

This comprehensive analysis examines performance data, risk metrics, tax implications, and community insights to help you make an informed decision between global diversification and US market concentration.

The Fundamental Difference

VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index, providing exposure to both US and international markets with approximately 60% US allocation and 40% international. This mirrors global market capitalization weights and offers true worldwide diversification across developed and emerging markets.

VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index, focusing exclusively on US equities with coverage of over 3,700 domestic stocks across all market capitalizations and sectors, as detailed by (Investopedia).

The choice between these funds essentially boils down to a fundamental question: Do you believe in global diversification, or do you want to concentrate your bets on the continued dominance of the US market?

Cost Analysis: Every Basis Point Matters

One of VTI’s most compelling advantages is its lower expense ratio, as confirmed by recent data from (VettaFi) and (VettaFi):

Fund	Expense Ratio	Annual Cost on $100,000
VT	0.06%	$60
VTI	0.03%	$30

While the 0.03% difference might seem trivial, this cost gap compounds significantly over time. On a $100,000 investment over 30 years, assuming 7% annual returns, the difference in fees alone could cost approximately $6,500 in additional expenses with VT.

However, it’s worth noting that both funds are exceptionally low-cost compared to the industry average of 0.37% for similar categories, making either choice a win for cost-conscious investors.

Performance Deep Dive

Historical Returns: The US Advantage

Over the past decade, VTI has significantly outperformed VT, according to data from (Stock Analysis):

Metric	VT	VTI
10-Year Annualized Return	8.95%	11.82%
1-Year Return (Recent)	10.72%	9.84%

VTI’s superior long-term performance reflects the exceptional strength of US markets, particularly driven by the technology sector’s dominance. However, recent performance shows VT slightly ahead, suggesting that international markets may be experiencing a cyclical upturn.

The Cyclical Nature of Performance

Investment performance is cyclical, and there have been extended periods where international markets outperformed US markets. The recent reversal in one-year returns (VT ahead at 10.72% vs VTI’s 9.84%) serves as a reminder that past performance doesn’t guarantee future results.

Risk and Volatility: The Surprising Truth

Contrary to common assumptions, VT actually exhibits lower risk metrics than VTI:

Risk Metric	VT	VTI
Daily Standard Deviation	17.78%	20.31%
Maximum Drawdown	-50.27%	-55.45%
Sharpe Ratio	0.67	0.55

These numbers reveal a counterintuitive insight: despite including emerging markets and international exposure, VT’s global diversification actually reduces overall portfolio volatility and provides better risk-adjusted returns.

The higher Sharpe ratio of 0.67 vs 0.55 indicates that VT delivers superior returns per unit of risk taken, challenging the notion that US-only investing is inherently safer.

Diversification Benefits

Geographic Risk Distribution

VT’s diversification advantages include:

• Reduced single-country risk through 40% international allocation
• Exposure to different economic cycles across regions
• Currency diversification providing natural hedging
• Access to growth in developing markets

Sector Balance

While VTI is heavily weighted toward US technology stocks (approximately 27.7% of the portfolio), VT balances this exposure with:

• European industrials and financials
• Asian manufacturing and technology
• Emerging market consumer goods and resources
• Different regulatory environments and market structures

The high correlation of 0.95 between VT and VTI shows they move similarly, but VT’s international component provides valuable diversification benefits during periods of US market stress.

Tax Efficiency Considerations

For US investors, tax efficiency can be a deciding factor, particularly in taxable accounts:

The VTI + VXUS Advantage

Many tax-savvy investors prefer holding VTI and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) separately rather than VT because, as discussed extensively on (Bogleheads):

• Foreign Tax Credit: You can claim credits for foreign taxes paid on international dividends
• Tax Loss Harvesting: Ability to sell one fund at a loss while maintaining similar exposure
• Flexible Allocation: Adjust US/international ratios based on market conditions or tax planning needs

Potential annual savings: 0.1-0.2% through foreign tax credits and tax optimization strategies.

When VT Makes Sense

In tax-advantaged accounts (IRAs, 401(k)s), tax efficiency is less relevant, making VT’s simplicity more attractive. The “one fund” approach eliminates the need to maintain specific allocation ratios between US and international exposure.

Community Insights and Investor Sentiment

The Great Divide

Investment community discussions on platforms like (Reddit) and (Reddit) reveal a passionate divide between VT and VTI advocates:

VT Supporters Argue:

• “Set it and forget it” simplicity
• Mean reversion suggests international markets are undervalued
• Global diversification reduces risk
• Avoids home country bias

VTI Supporters Counter:

• Lower costs compound over decades
• US market dominance likely to continue
• Easier tax optimization in taxable accounts
• Historical performance speaks for itself

International Perspective

Non-US investors often prefer VT to avoid over-concentration in their home markets. For example, Canadian and European investors frequently choose VT to maintain global diversification rather than doubling down on North American or European markets through VTI.

Valuation Considerations

Some analyses suggest international markets trade at lower valuations (PE ratios around 14.9 for international vs 18.8 for US), potentially offering better value for future returns. However, these valuation gaps have persisted for years, raising questions about when or if they’ll close.

The Case for VT: Global Diversification

Choose VT if you:

• Value simplicity and want a single fund solution
• Believe in global diversification and want to avoid home country bias
• Prefer lower volatility and better risk-adjusted returns
• Invest primarily in tax-advantaged accounts where tax efficiency is less important
• Think international markets are undervalued and due for outperformance
• Want exposure to different economic cycles and growth patterns

VT’s Key Advantages:

• Lower volatility and better risk-adjusted returns
• True global diversification
• Single fund simplicity
• Higher dividend yield (1.85% vs 1.32%)
• Reduced maximum drawdowns during market stress

The Case for VTI: US Market Focus

Choose VTI if you:

• Prioritize cost minimization and every basis point matters
• Believe in continued US market dominance driven by innovation and economic strength
• Want maximum tax efficiency in taxable accounts (combined with VXUS)
• Prefer the flexibility to adjust international allocation independently
• Are comfortable with higher volatility for potentially higher returns
• Want to make a concentrated bet on the world’s largest economy

VTI’s Key Advantages:

• Lower expense ratio (0.03% vs 0.06%)
• Superior historical performance over the past decade
• Better tax optimization opportunities for US investors
• Flexibility to pair with VXUS for customized allocation
• Focused exposure to the world’s most innovative companies

Making the Decision: Which is Right for You?

For Most Long-Term Investors: Consider VT

The evidence suggests that VT may be the better choice for most long-term investors, particularly those who value:

• Risk-adjusted returns over absolute returns
• Simplicity in portfolio management
• Diversification as a risk management tool

The lower volatility, better Sharpe ratio, and reduced drawdowns make VT an attractive option for investors with 30+ year time horizons who want to sleep well at night.

For Cost-Conscious Optimizers: VTI + VXUS

Active investors who want maximum control should consider the VTI + VXUS combination for:

• Tax optimization in taxable accounts
• Cost minimization through lower expense ratios
• Flexible allocation adjustments
• Maximum customization options

The Hybrid Approach

Some investors split the difference by holding both funds or using a core-satellite approach with VTI as the core and international exposure through other funds.

Account Type Matters

In tax-advantaged accounts (IRA, 401k): VT’s simplicity makes it highly attractive since tax efficiency isn’t a concern.

In taxable accounts: VTI + VXUS may provide better after-tax returns for US investors through foreign tax credits and tax-loss harvesting opportunities.

Bottom Line

Both VT and VTI are exceptional low-cost funds that can serve as the foundation of a successful long-term investment strategy. Your choice should reflect your:

• Risk tolerance (VT offers lower volatility)
• Cost sensitivity (VTI has lower fees)
• Tax situation (VTI + VXUS may be more tax-efficient)
• Investment philosophy (global diversification vs US concentration)
• Account types (tax-advantaged vs taxable)

For most investors, VT offers the best combination of diversification, risk management, and simplicity, making it an excellent “one fund” solution for long-term wealth building. However, cost-conscious investors with the time and knowledge to optimize may prefer the VTI + VXUS combination for maximum flexibility and tax efficiency.

The most important decision isn’t necessarily which fund you choose, but that you start investing consistently in low-cost, diversified funds and stay the course through market cycles. Both VT and VTI can help you build long-term wealth – the key is picking one and sticking with it.

FAQ

Is VT or VTI better for long-term investing? +

Both are excellent options but serve different purposes. VT provides global diversification with lower volatility and better risk-adjusted returns, making it ideal for "set and forget" investing. VTI offers lower costs (0.03% vs 0.06%) and has historically outperformed due to US market strength, making it suitable for cost-conscious investors betting on continued US dominance.

Does VT have higher fees than VTI? +

Yes, VT has a higher expense ratio of 0.06% compared to VTI's 0.03%. While this 0.03% difference seems small, it can compound significantly over decades, potentially costing thousands in a large portfolio over 30+ years.

Which is more tax-efficient for US investors? +

For US investors in taxable accounts, holding VTI + VXUS separately can be more tax-efficient than VT. This combination allows you to claim foreign tax credits and enables tax-loss harvesting, potentially saving 0.1-0.2% annually. However, VT offers simplicity with just one fund to manage.

Is VT riskier than VTI due to international exposure? +

VT actually has lower volatility (17.78% daily standard deviation vs 20.31% for VTI) and better risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio of 0.67 vs 0.55). This is because international diversification helps reduce overall portfolio risk, despite including emerging markets.

Which has better historical performance? +

Over the past 10 years, VTI has outperformed with 11.82% annualized returns vs VT's 8.95%. However, recent 1-year performance shows VT ahead at 10.72% vs 9.84%, suggesting cyclical patterns where international markets sometimes outperform US markets.

How much international exposure does VT provide? +

VT allocates approximately 60% to US stocks and 40% to international markets (developed and emerging). This provides geographic diversification while still maintaining significant US exposure, as the US represents about 60% of global market capitalization.

—

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Investing involves risks, including the possible loss of principal. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.