JEPI vs. JEPQ: Income Strategy Showdown

In the world of income investing, few battles are as intriguing as the showdown between JPMorgan’s two covered call champions: JEPI and JEPQ. Both promise monthly dividends through sophisticated options strategies, but their approaches couldn’t be more different. One surprising twist? The newer JEPQ is currently outpaying its legendary sibling with an 11.23% yield versus JEPI’s 7.79%—flipping the script on what many investors expected.

The Tale of Two Strategies

JEPI (JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF) launched as the conservative income play, focusing on S&P 500 low-volatility stocks combined with covered call strategies (Yahoo Finance). Think of it as the defensive coordinator of income investing—designed to preserve capital while generating steady monthly cash flow.

JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF), the newer player launched in May 2022, takes the aggressive approach. It targets Nasdaq-100 growth stocks and uses the higher volatility of tech giants to generate bigger option premiums (Yahoo Finance). It’s the offensive coordinator—willing to take more risk for potentially higher rewards.

The Yield Surprise: JEPQ Takes the Lead

Here’s where things get interesting. Despite JEPI’s reputation as the high-yield darling, JEPQ currently delivers a superior dividend yield:

Metric	JEPI	JEPQ
Current Dividend Yield	7.79%	11.23%
Trailing 12M Yield	8.06%	11.36%
1-Year Total Return	5.19%	7.49%
3-Year Annualized	8.64%	15.68%

Why the reversal? JEPQ’s focus on volatile Nasdaq-100 stocks allows it to collect larger option premiums. When you’re selling covered calls on NVIDIA and Apple instead of utility stocks, you can charge higher prices for those options—and that translates directly to bigger dividend payments.

Risk vs. Reward: The Volatility Trade-Off

JEPQ’s higher yields come with a clear trade-off: significantly higher volatility.

JEPI’s defensive approach shows in its numbers:

• Daily standard deviation: 13.82%
• Maximum drawdown: -13.71%
• Portfolio concentration (top 10): 15.91%

JEPQ’s aggressive stance is evident:

• Daily standard deviation: 20.27%
• Maximum drawdown: -20.07%
• Portfolio concentration (top 10): 43.57%

The concentration risk tells the real story. JEPQ’s top holdings read like a who’s who of tech: Apple (7.38%), Microsoft (6.89%), NVIDIA (6.40%). Nearly half the fund sits in just ten companies, mostly tech giants. JEPI spreads its bets more evenly across sectors, with its largest holding (Mastercard) representing just 1.70%.

Market Conditions Matter

The performance gap between these ETFs shifts dramatically based on market conditions:

Bear Market Performance (2022):

• JEPI: -3.54% decline
• JEPQ: Launched mid-2022, limited data

Bull Market Potential: JEPQ’s tech-heavy focus positions it to benefit more from growth market conditions, but this same concentration makes it vulnerable during tech selloffs.

This dynamic creates an interesting tactical consideration: JEPI might serve better as a permanent portfolio holding, while JEPQ could be more suitable for investors who can time market cycles or who believe in long-term tech dominance.

The Hidden Complexity: ELNs and Tax Implications

Both ETFs employ Equity Linked Notes (ELNs) to implement their covered call strategies—a detail many investors overlook. These are essentially debt instruments that introduce minor credit risk, though JPMorgan’s strong creditworthiness mitigates this concern.

Tax consideration: Option income gets treated as ordinary income, not qualified dividends. For high-income investors, this means potentially paying 37% federal tax rates on distributions instead of the 20% rate on qualified dividends—a significant after-tax return difference that could favor traditional dividend stocks or growth ETFs in taxable accounts.

Community Verdict: A House Divided

Investor sentiment splits along predictable lines:

JEPQ advocates point to higher yields and growth potential, with many Reddit users noting they “like JEPQ’s holdings more, especially mega cap growth companies” (Reddit Discussion).

JEPI supporters emphasize stability and capital preservation, viewing JEPI as “a low volatility defensive investment designed to preserve account value” (Reddit ETFs).

The contrarian view: Many experienced investors suggest younger people skip both for pure growth ETFs like VOO or QQQ, arguing that covered call strategies limit long-term wealth building potential.

Which Strategy Wins?

The answer depends entirely on your investment objectives and risk tolerance:

Choose JEPI if you:

• Prioritize capital preservation over maximum yield
• Want lower volatility and broader diversification
• Expect or fear bear market conditions
• Need steady, predictable income streams
• Prefer the “sleep well at night” approach

Choose JEPQ if you:

• Can handle higher volatility for potentially higher returns
• Believe in long-term tech sector dominance
• Want maximum current yield from your income allocation
• Have a longer investment horizon
• Can stomach 20%+ portfolio swings

Consider both if you:

• Want to balance stability with growth potential
• Can manage the complexity of multiple positions
• Believe in diversifying income strategies
• Have sufficient portfolio size to justify multiple holdings

The Bigger Picture

While the JEPI vs. JEPQ debate generates passionate discussion, both ETFs represent just one tool in a comprehensive investment strategy. The real question isn’t which is “better”—it’s which better serves your specific financial goals.

For retirement-focused investors seeking immediate income with capital preservation, JEPI’s defensive approach makes sense. For those who can accept higher volatility in exchange for potentially superior long-term returns, JEPQ offers an intriguing proposition.

The surprising winner? In current market conditions, JEPQ delivers both higher yields and better total returns, challenging assumptions about the trade-offs between growth and income (Seeking Alpha). But remember—markets change, and yesterday’s winner can become tomorrow’s laggard.

Bottom line: Both ETFs offer legitimate approaches to income investing, but they serve different masters. JEPI serves stability; JEPQ serves potential. Choose based on which master you prefer to serve, knowing that the best strategy is often the one you can stick with through complete market cycles.

The future belongs to investors who understand their own risk tolerance—and match their investments accordingly.

FAQ

Which ETF has a higher dividend yield, JEPI or JEPQ? +

JEPQ currently offers a higher dividend yield at 11.23% compared to JEPI's 7.79%. This higher yield comes from JEPQ's focus on the more volatile Nasdaq-100, which allows it to collect larger option premiums through its covered call strategy.

What's the main difference between JEPI and JEPQ? +

JEPI focuses on S&P 500 low-volatility value stocks for stability, while JEPQ targets Nasdaq-100 growth stocks, particularly tech companies. This makes JEPI more defensive and JEPQ more growth-oriented with higher potential returns but increased volatility.

Which ETF has higher concentration risk? +

JEPQ has significantly higher concentration risk, with its top 10 holdings making up 43.57% of assets (heavily weighted in tech), compared to JEPI's more diversified 15.91% concentration. This makes JEPQ more susceptible to sector-specific downturns.

Which performs better in bear markets? +

JEPI is generally better for bear markets due to its defensive S&P 500 focus and lower volatility (13.82% vs 20.27% for JEPQ). JEPI declined only 3.54% during the 2022 bear market, demonstrating its capital preservation qualities.

Are there any hidden risks with these ETFs? +

Both ETFs use Equity Linked Notes (ELNs) to implement their covered call strategies, which introduces minor credit risk. However, this is mitigated by JPMorgan's strong creditworthiness. Additionally, option income is taxed as ordinary income, potentially reducing after-tax returns.

Which ETF has better total returns? +

JEPQ has outperformed with 7.49% returns over the past year versus JEPI's 5.19%, and shows 15.68% three-year annualized returns compared to JEPI's 8.64%. However, this comes with higher volatility and larger potential drawdowns.

Which is better for income investors? +

JEPI is better for income stability due to its lower volatility and defensive positioning, while JEPQ offers higher potential yields and growth but with increased risk. Your choice should depend on your risk tolerance and whether you prioritize stability or growth potential.

Are these ETFs suitable for young investors? +

Many financial advisors suggest younger investors focus on growth ETFs like VOO or QQQ instead of covered call strategies, as these income-focused ETFs may limit long-term wealth building potential compared to pure equity exposure.

Can you hold both JEPI and JEPQ together? +

Some investors use both for diversification—JEPI for stability and JEPQ for growth potential. This approach can balance the defensive nature of JEPI with the higher return potential of JEPQ, though it also increases complexity and costs.

—

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Investing involves risks, including the possible loss of principal. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.