FNILX vs VOO: Zero Fees Face Vanguard's Giant

Since launching its revolutionary ZERO fund lineup in 2018, Fidelity has challenged the investment industry’s fee structure. Among these zero-fee options, FNILX stands out as a compelling alternative to established large-cap funds like Vanguard’s VOO. But is “free” always better? Let’s dive into a comprehensive comparison of these two investment powerhouses.

The Fundamental Difference: Cost vs. Structure

The most obvious distinction between these funds lies in their fees and structure:

FNILX: The Zero-Fee Pioneer

FNILX (Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund) revolutionized the investment landscape as part of Fidelity’s ZERO fund family. Its standout feature is the 0% expense ratio – you pay absolutely nothing in annual management fees (Fidelity FNILX). For a $10,000 investment over 30 years, this could save around $150-300 compared to even ultra-low-cost alternatives (assuming 7% annual returns).

As a mutual fund, FNILX offers:

• Fractional share purchases (ideal for small investors)
• Automatic investments
• End-of-day pricing
• Exclusive availability through Fidelity accounts

VOO: The Established ETF Giant

VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) charges a minimal 0.03% expense ratio, meaning you pay $3 annually per $10,000 invested (Vanguard VOO). While not zero, this fee is still remarkably low and has been a benchmark for cost-efficiency in the industry.

As an ETF, VOO provides:

• Intraday trading flexibility
• Broader availability across all brokerages
• Generally superior tax efficiency
• No redemption fees or trading restrictions

The Index Difference: Proprietary vs. Standard

Surprising Fact: While many investors assume these funds are identical except for fees, they actually track different indices – a crucial distinction that affects performance (Reddit Bogleheads).

FNILX: Fidelity’s Proprietary Approach

FNILX tracks the Fidelity U.S. Large Cap Index, a proprietary benchmark designed by Fidelity. This index includes approximately 500 of the largest U.S. companies by market capitalization, similar to the S&P 500 but without licensing costs (Bankrate).

By creating its own index, Fidelity avoids paying licensing fees to S&P Dow Jones Indices, a key factor enabling the zero-fee structure. However, this means FNILX’s holdings and weightings may slightly differ from the S&P 500 at times.

VOO: The Gold Standard Index

VOO precisely tracks the S&P 500 Index, arguably the world’s most recognized equity benchmark. The S&P 500 is maintained by a committee that selects 500 leading U.S. companies based on specific criteria including market capitalization, liquidity, and profitability (Forbes).

This standardized approach means VOO’s performance will always mirror the widely-reported S&P 500 returns you see in financial news.

Holdings and Performance: Nearly Identical Twins

Despite tracking different indices, both funds maintain remarkably similar portfolios:

Metric	FNILX	VOO
Number of Holdings	~500	503
Top Holdings	Apple (6.94%), Microsoft (5.77%), NVIDIA (5.50%)	Apple (6.76%), Microsoft (6.22%), NVIDIA (5.65%)
Top Sectors	Technology (29.75%), Healthcare (11.30%), Financials (14.53%)	Technology (31.71%), Healthcare (10.86%), Financials (13.68%)
Correlation	1.00 (nearly perfect alignment with VOO)	—
5-Year Returns	~15.55% (Yahoo Finance FNILX)	~17.5% (Dividend.com VOO)

The performance differential typically remains minimal (under 0.5% annually), with periods of both outperformance and underperformance for FNILX relative to VOO. The close correlation (1.00) indicates these funds move in virtual lockstep.

Tax Considerations: A Significant Distinction

For taxable accounts, the structural differences between these funds can meaningfully impact after-tax returns:

FNILX: Potential Tax Inefficiencies

As a mutual fund, FNILX must distribute capital gains to shareholders when:

• Investors redeem shares in cash (potentially forcing the fund to sell holdings)
• The fund rebalances its portfolio

These distributions are taxable events for investors holding FNILX in taxable accounts, potentially reducing after-tax returns despite the zero-fee advantage (SEC FNILX).

VOO: Tax-Efficient Structure

VOO’s ETF structure offers superior tax efficiency through:

• In-kind redemptions: Large institutional investors can exchange ETF shares for the underlying securities without triggering taxable events
• Lower turnover: VOO’s 2% annual turnover (vs. FNILX’s 5%) means fewer realized capital gains

Since its inception in 2010, VOO has made minimal capital gains distributions, making it potentially more suitable for taxable accounts despite its 0.03% fee (Investopedia).

Accessibility and Portability: Freedom vs. Fidelity

FNILX: Platform Limitations

FNILX is exclusively available through Fidelity accounts. While this isn’t an issue for Fidelity customers, it creates significant restrictions:

• Cannot be transferred to other brokerages without selling (potentially triggering tax consequences)
• Limited to Fidelity’s platform and services
• May complicate consolidating accounts in the future

VOO: Unrestricted Flexibility

As an ETF, VOO can be:

• Purchased at virtually any brokerage
• Transferred between accounts without selling
• Traded throughout the market day
• Used in more complex investment strategies (options, margin, etc.)

The Verdict: Which Fund Should You Choose?

The optimal choice depends largely on your specific circumstances:

Consider FNILX if:

• You’re already a satisfied Fidelity customer
• You primarily invest in tax-advantaged accounts (IRAs, 401(k)s)
• You value absolute cost minimization
• You don’t plan to transfer your investments to another brokerage

Consider VOO if:

• You invest in taxable accounts (where tax efficiency matters more than the 0.03% fee)
• You value flexibility to move between brokerages
• You prefer intraday trading capabilities
• You want to precisely track the S&P 500 benchmark

Real-World Impact: The Surprising Math

For perspective, let’s quantify the potential difference in outcomes:

For a $10,000 investment growing at 7% annually:

• FNILX (0% fee): $76,123 after 30 years
• VOO (0.03% fee): $74,993 after 30 years
• Difference: $1,130 (1.5%)

However, if VOO’s tax efficiency saves just 0.1% annually in a taxable account, it would outperform FNILX by approximately $2,200 over the same period, more than offsetting the fee difference.

Community Perspective

Investor opinions from forums like Bogleheads and Reddit’s r/personalfinance highlight practical considerations:

One Redditor noted: “FNILX’s zero fee is attractive, but I switched to VOO in my taxable account after getting hit with capital gains distributions two years in a row. The 0.03% fee is worth the tax peace of mind.” (Reddit Bogleheads)

A Bogleheads member shared: “I hold FNILX in my Roth IRA and VOO in my taxable account – best of both worlds. Zero fees where tax efficiency doesn’t matter, and better tax treatment where it does.”

Final Thoughts: The Zero-Fee Revolution Continues

FNILX represents Fidelity’s bold challenge to the investment industry’s fee structure, while VOO exemplifies Vanguard’s longstanding commitment to low-cost, tax-efficient investing. Both approaches have merit, and the “better” option ultimately depends on your personal circumstances.

The competition between these funds benefits all investors, as pressure mounts on the entire industry to reduce fees and improve services. Whether you choose FNILX’s zero-fee innovation or VOO’s time-tested efficiency, you’re making a sound decision for long-term wealth building with either of these excellent large-cap index funds.

What’s your experience with these funds? Have you noticed performance differences or tax implications? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

FAQ

Is FNILX the same as S&P 500? +

No, FNILX tracks the Fidelity U.S. Large Cap Index, a proprietary index that's similar to but not identical to the S&P 500. It aims to mirror the performance of the largest 500 U.S. companies.

What is the expense ratio of FNILX? +

FNILX has a 0% expense ratio, meaning there are no annual management fees charged to investors.

What is the expense ratio of VOO? +

VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03%, which is very low but not zero.

Can I buy FNILX at any brokerage? +

No, FNILX is only available through Fidelity's platform. It cannot be purchased at other brokerages.

Can I buy VOO at any brokerage? +

Yes, as an ETF, VOO can be purchased through virtually any brokerage account.

Does FNILX pay dividends? +

Yes, FNILX pays dividends semi-annually with a yield of approximately 1.1% annually.

Does VOO pay dividends? +

Yes, VOO pays dividends quarterly with a yield of approximately 1.2% annually.

Which is more tax-efficient, FNILX or VOO? +

VOO is generally more tax-efficient due to its ETF structure, which allows for in-kind redemptions that minimize capital gains distributions.

Can I trade FNILX during market hours? +

No, as a mutual fund, FNILX trades only once per day after the market closes at the net asset value (NAV) established at that time.

Can I trade VOO during market hours? +

Yes, as an ETF, VOO can be bought and sold throughout the trading day at current market prices.

Is FNILX a good long-term investment? +

Yes, FNILX can be an excellent long-term investment, especially for Fidelity customers seeking zero-fee large-cap exposure in tax-advantaged accounts.

Is VOO a good long-term investment? +

Yes, VOO is widely considered one of the best core holdings for long-term investors due to its broad market exposure, low costs, and strong track record.

Which fund has performed better historically? +

Both funds have performed similarly due to their similar holdings, though VOO has a longer track record. Over the past 5 years, VOO has returned approximately 17.5% while FNILX has returned about 15.55%.

Can I transfer FNILX to another brokerage? +

No, FNILX cannot be transferred to non-Fidelity accounts. If you want to move your investments, you would need to sell your FNILX shares and potentially incur tax consequences.

Does FNILX have a minimum investment? +

No, FNILX has no minimum investment requirement, making it accessible to all investors.

—

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Investing involves risks, including the possible loss of principal. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.